top of page

Options for Analysis

We can choose between analyzing these compounds by UPLC/MS, HPLC/MS and GC/MS

Many Different Compounds of Interest

There are different cannabinoids, including THC, THCA, CBD, CBDA, CBG, CBN and CBC, each with different peaks in chromatograms.

Issues with GC/MS here

THCA and CBDA are not biologically available and need to be decarboxylated before consumption. 

Mini-conclusion

We don't care for THC, but not to ensure that the quantities are under 0.3% (THC + THCA) but we need to quantify available CBD, and GC would decarboxylate the CBDA when volatilizing it. Therefore, HPLC is the better option here. 

HPLC/MS Analysis - Cannabinoids

Many columns can be used for HPLC-MS separation of cannabinoids. The Agilent 959961-902 has been used here (page 4) while Sigma-Aldrich has outlined multiple other columns which can be used for terpene, cannabinoid, and pesticide analysis here (pages 6, 9 and 12 respectively). This Sigma-Aldrich paper has good outlines for pesticide, terpene and cannabinoid standards, and will be referenced heavily. However, due to HPLC/MS being inferior to GC/MS as a testing standard for terpenes, please see our page on GC/MS for terpene analysis, as this is what good looks like. 

The certified reference materials for the cannabinoids of interest are THC, THC-A, CBD, and CBD-A. These can all be obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, under the term 'analytical sample', and of the names Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol solutionDelta9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid A solution, Cannabidiol solutionand Cannabidiolic acid solution. 

Included below, there are two figures from within the Sigma-Aldrich Cannabis Testing outline. The ones on the left outline different standards for cannabinoid quantification as well as usable columns. On the right are two examples of HPLC runs with UV detectors for cannabinoid quantifications and peak labeling. 

Cannabinoid Analysis HPLC.PNG
Sigma Aldrich Cannabinoid standards.PNG
HPLC Columns.PNG
Anchor 1

HPLC/MS Analysis - Terpenes

HPLC/MS and GC/MS can both be used for the quantification of various terpenes found within C. sativa cultivars. The choice of HPLC/MS is, however, less ideal due to the reduction in peak separation when compared to GC/MS. If terpene quantification were done with HPLC/MS, the column used for cannabinoid quantification, pesticide analysis and residual solvent analysis could be used. To the right is a list, taken from here, depicting a list of possible terpenes and their corresponding Certified Reference Materials available from Sigma-Aldrich. 

Terpene columns.PNG
Terpenes.PNG

UPLC/MS-HPLC/MS Standards for Cannabinoids, Terpenes, and Pesticides

The standards and cannabinoids of interest to be analyzed are THC, THC-A, CBD, and CBD-A. These can all be obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, under the term 'analytical sample', and of the names Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol solutionDelta9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid A solution, Cannabidiol solution, and Cannabidiolic acid solution.

Specific terpenes to be analyzed have not yet been determined. There are samples available for purchase from Sigma-Aldrich, as to be expected. A list of standards can be found here (Page 8) and below. A list of various phytocompounds and their mass analyses can be found here (Table 2)

In terms of pesticides, a list of certified reference materials can be found below, linking to page 13 of Sigma-Aldirch's Cannabis Testing PDF. Testing for all of these is ideal, albeit not necessary. Exact requirements will be elucidated in the future, before testing. 

The law currently reads as follows:

(4) For purposes of the pesticide chemical residue test, a marijuana sample shall be deemed to have passed if it satisfies the most stringent acceptable standard for a pesticide chemical residue in any food item as set forth in Subpart C of the federal Environmental Protection Agency’s regulations for Tolerances and Exemptions for Pesticide Chemical Residues in Food, 40 CFR 180.

This leads to a list of approximately 405 different pesticides, which would be unreasonable to test for, broadly. The solution is to identify the most common pesticides being applied to C. sativa hemp cultivars and to then test the products for that. 

Standard sample preparation:

  • Create a standard of 100ng/mL of CBD, CBDA, THC, and THCA in dilution solvent​

    • Dilution Solvent: 0.005% formic acid, 5% water, 95% methanol

    • CBD and THC stock solutions in MeOH should be stored at -20​℃ until use, then thawed at ~20℃

    • CBDA and THCA stock solutions in MeOH should be stored at -80℃ until use, then thawed at ~20℃

  • Create an internal standard from THC-d3, CBD-d3, and THCCOOH-d3

    • The concentration should be 10ng/mL of each reference analyte​

    • All stock solutions for the internal standard (in MeOH) should be stored at -20℃ until use, then thawed at ~20℃

    • THC-d3 and CBD-d3 should be used as internal standards for THC and CBD respectively

    • THCCOOH-d3 should be used as an internal standard for THCA and CBDA

Calibration curve

  • Serial dilution of stock solution

    • Stock solution - 5​0ng/mL each of CBD, THC, CBDA, THCA  diluted in a 10ng/mL THC-d3, CBD-d3 and THCCOOH-d3 solution to:

      • In ng/mL: 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12, 1.56, 0.78, 0.39 and 0.19​

        • Creates constant concentration of THC-d3, CBD-d3 and THCCOOH-d3 in each solution​ (Internal Standard)

    • Peak area ratio of analytes and corresponding IS vs concentration fit with a weighted quadratic or linear curve in Analyst software

    • Quality control samples can be used (MCT oil or olive oil - whatever extract oil applicable to CBD oil being analyzed) 

      • 200ng/mL, 50ng/mL, 5ng/mL and 0.5ng/mL for every batch​

Pesticide references for Cannabis.PNG

Sample Preparation for HPLC/MS Analysis

Samples will need to be prepared properly for HPLC analysis, whether it be for cannabinoids, terpenes or pesticides. Please see the paper here, page 3-4, Sample Preparation, for proper technique. Information from this article is outlined below. Note that this will require an ultrasonication device and a centrifuge (11,000 rpm).

Sonicator public domain.png
centrifuge.jpg

HPLC/MS Conditions Taken from Literature

The following conditions were taken from this article, which utilized HPLC/MS to quantify CBD, CBDa, THC, and THCa in various products and samples to an LLOQ of 100µg/mL. 

Applicable Abbreviations

  • EP - Entrance Potential

  • CP - Collision Potential

  • CE - Collision Energy

  • DP - De-coupling Potential

  • CXP - Collision Exit Potential

  • CEP - Collision Entrance Potential

  • RRT - Relative Retention Time

  • RT - Retention Time

  • LOD - Limit of Detection

  • LLOD - Lower Limit of Detection

  • LOQ - Limit of Quantification

  • LLOQ - Lower Limit of Quantification

  • MRM - Multiple Reaction Monitoring

HPLC Conditions:

  • HPLC - Agilent 1260

  • Column - Agilent Eclipse Plus 95 Å C18 (4.6 x 100mm x 3.5µm particle size)

    • With guard column

  • Mobile Phase: isocratic, 1:9 [10:90] water (0.1% formic acid):acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid)

  • Flow rate: 0.5mL/min, 11 min - first two min discarded

  • Column temperature = 40℃

  • Autosampler temperature = 4℃

  • Injection volume - 20µL

 

MS Conditions

  • Mass Spectrometer - SCIEX 5500 QTRAP with TurboV source

  • Shared conditions

    • Collision and curtain gas - Nitrogen

    • Temperature = 600℃

    • Gas source 1 = 50psi

    • Gas source 2 = 70psi

    • Curtain gas pressure: 30psi

    • Collision gas: MED (9 for SCIEX QTRAP 5500 Mass Spectrometer)

  • Negative Mode Conditions (CBDa, THCa, THCCOOH-d3)

    • DP = -155V

    • EP = -10V

    • Ion spray voltage = -4500V

    • Quantification - transitions

      • First transition (performed for CBDa, THCa, and THCCOOH-d3)

        • m/z 357.0 → 339.0

          • CE = -29V, 100ms, CXP = -15V, RT: 3.9 min

        • m/z 357.0 → 313.0

          • CE = -34V, 100ms, CXP = -7V, RT: 8.5 min

        • m/z 346.2 → 302.2

          • CE = -22V, 100ms, CXP = -15V, RT: 3.45 min

      • Second transition (Each transition below for each analyte was used to confirm the identities of CBDa, THCa, and THCCOOH-d3)

        • m/z 357.0 → 179.0

          • CE = -30V, 100ms, CXP = -15V

        • m/z 357.0 → 245.0

          • CE = -43V, 100ms, CXP = -5V

        • m/z 346.2 → 248.1

          • CE = -35V, 100ms, CXP = -15V

  • Positive Mode Conditions (CBD and THC identification)

    • DP: 100V

    • EP: 10.00V

    • CXP: 15.00V

    • Ion spray voltage: 4500V

    • Quantification - transitions

      • First transition

        • m/z 315.0 → 193.0

          • CE = 30V, 100ms

            • CBD RT: 4.2 min

            • THC RT: 6.8 min

        • m/z 318.0 → 196.0

          • CE: 30V, 100ms

            • CBD-d3 RT: 4.2 min

            • THC-d3 RT: 6.8 min

      • Second transition (THC vs CBD identification)

        • m/z 315.0 → 259.0

          • CE: 30V, 100ms

bottom of page